2015 book list
The Moon Spinners [Mary Stewart] - My first read of the year, this one had gorgeous prose on the one hand and a not-so-compelling story-line and romance on the other. Light, inspiring when it came to description, but ultimately a bit frustrating.
To Change the World [James Davison Hunter] - A compelling, thought-provoking, dense work, one which probably needs to be read more than once to be "gotten." Hunter's call for "faithful presence" and a Christian challenge to the world via "a bursting out of new creation from within it" is worth reading, considering, and realizing.
The First Crusade [T. Asbridge] - Read for a course on the Crusades I took in the spring. Light and accessible, but heavy on the adjectives and adverbs (history can be interesting without reliance on these grammatical tools! really! it can!) and lacking, in my opinion, a good balance of historical empathy and moral discernment.
They Found Him Dead [G. Heyer] - I don't think I'll be reading any more of Heyer's mysteries - or if I do, it will only be when I really need something light, quick, and mindless. Characters, prose, and resolution here were all pretty unremarkable; Agatha Christie has more challenging, satisfying mysteries, however cliche that opinion may be.
Much Obliged, Jeeves [P.G. Wodehouse] - Needs no commentary. And honestly, I can never remember what happened in a given Jeeves & Wooster novel; they're all much alike, but make for fun occasional reading.
The Fourth Crusade [D. Queller & T. Madden] - Also for the Crusades course! This one was at the opposite extreme from The First Crusade: good on analysis, a bit weak on drama. Seriously, the crusaders breach the walls and all the authors say is that we know these particular people died. Really? Where's the blood and gore, people?
Around the World in Eight Days [J. Verne] - Where is the hot air balloon? I specifically signed on for a hot air balloon.
The Crusades Through Arab Eyes [A. Maalouf] - For some reason I didn't put this on my Goodreads account; I think I must not have wanted to rate it. At any rate, while I do think it is excellent to have works that portray the Crusades from the perspective of the Arabs (the Frankish perspective gets most of the limelight), I remember finding this attempt problematic - to say the least.
The Great Plague [Moote & Moote] - Doesn't Moote & Moote sound like a law-firm out a Dickens novel? Anyway, this was the assigned reading in the three-week course I took this past May on "Plague! In the 1660s," and it was excellent. Cheerful? No. Surprisingly compelling and even inspiring? Yes.
Jamaica Inn [D. du Maurier] - du Maurier, why did you let me down? Your prose was beautiful as always, your depiction of Cornwall haunting and bleak - and then I got to the end and wanted to bean the characters with my life science book. Go. To. Your. Rooms.
The Perfect Prince [A. Wroe] - I don't even know what to do with this one. It began so intriguingly, with such attention to detail - even the detail of a signature or an illustration; aaaaand then there I was in a bog of information and names and I was alternately confused, bored, and guilty (maybe I should care how much the pews in the church cost? But I don't?). I don't think I'm building a summer home here.
Sir Nigel [A. Conan Doyle] - This book seemed to alternate between romanticism and realism, and I liked the realism better. Conan Doyle has some compelling descriptions and interesting side characters, but Sir Nigel himself was too ideal for me.
American Lion [J. Meacham] - Totally arbitrary read - I don't do much American history - that unfortunately didn't turn out to be a gem. In fact I complained about the style and the use of sources all the way through. I think my family wanted me to stop reading.
Faith and Treason [A. Fraser] - Among the top two or three books I read this year (which isn't saying much, because this year saw a lot of 2 star books). I was going to say it blew me away, but that's kind of a bad pun for a book dealing with the 1605 Gunpowder Plot... Drama, empathy, argument, a grasp of the sources: it has it all. Except it was so good that when the conspirators were caught, I was disappointed. That might not be a good thing.
She-Wolves [H. Castor] - Mini-bios of some of England's ruling ladies since the Empress Maud (who, by the way, is the coolest. Just pointing that out). Some were more interesting than others, but the prose is burdened (again) with melodrama.
The Ghost Map [S. Johnson] - Congratulations! You win Worst Book of the Year! The arrogance of it took my breath away, while the commitment to urbanization and the almost callous treatment of individuals left me angry.
The Prince [Machiavelli] - Read for a course on political thought, this classic work was alternately funny and perplexing. On the one hand, it seems refreshing after you've been reading Plato, because Machiavelli deals with things as they are in real life; on the other hand, he doesn't concern himself at all with larger moral truths or with how things should be. Also, I love how he keeps saying Cesare Borgia was the very model of a modern major general...and yet Borgia got sick and failed at everything. Score one for "Fortune."
For All the Tea in China [S. Rose] - Pretty sure this is the only book my list shares with Jenny's. A slim read and good for any tea-drinker, if rather in need of some polishing and FOOTNOTES. Or at least endnotes. Please. Please? No? Okay, fine.
The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde [R. L. Stevenson] - I'd been wanting to read this for a while, but despite its atmosphere, I just didn't enjoy it as much as I thought I would. "I consider morals to be an admirable trait of character in a book, but they can be overdone."
The Great Influenza [J. Barry] - Like The Ghost Map, this was read for a course on the history of Western medicine I took this past semester. Better than The Ghost Map in that it has a far better handle on the sources and a much more nuanced reading of them, it nonetheless could have done with some slimming down.
Great Expectations [C. Dickens] - Finished this one before Christmas. It wasn't actually my favorite Dickens of the ones I've read thus far; the ending was...too happy. I would have liked some more bitter in that "bittersweet." Oops.
In Defense of History [R. Evans] - My advisor got me this for my birthday back in January, while I was taking a course on historiography, and I just finished it yesterday (no, I haven't been reading it all year). It's both solid on its philosophy of history and funny in its treatment of other historians or historical controversies. A gem with which to finish out the year.
what did you read this year? was it a good year by the numbers, or did you find some new favorites? neither? both?